[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMEtUuz4Qyg1s7CocNotTYXcn1odcbT5nek1T66dd+dK3ukfTw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 16:11:47 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Xi Wang <xi.wang@...il.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] fix unsafe set_memory_rw from softirq
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-10-03 at 15:47 -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>
>> @@ -722,7 +725,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sk_unattached_filter_destroy);
>> int sk_attach_filter(struct sock_fprog *fprog, struct sock *sk)
>> {
>> struct sk_filter *fp, *old_fp;
>> - unsigned int fsize = sizeof(struct sock_filter) * fprog->len;
>> + unsigned int fsize = max(sizeof(struct sock_filter) * fprog->len,
>> + sizeof(struct work_struct));
>> int err;
>>
>> if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_FILTER_LOCKED))
>
> Thats broken, as we might copy more data from user than expected,
> and eventually trigger EFAULT :
>
> if (copy_from_user(fp->insns, fprog->filter, fsize)) {
yes. will fix.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists