[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131004083033.GA1658@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 10:30:33 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
akpm@...uxfoundation.org, Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [pchecks v2 0/2] percpu v3: Implement Preemption checks for
__this_cpu operations
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> User-Agent: quilt/0.50-1
>
> You might want to upgrade your quilt the latest version is 0.60-1 and
> there's talk of actually releasing something newer.
Another technical problem with the submission is the lack of 'PATCH' tags
for the patches - it's the standard and ther are folks search lkml based
on that pattern.
See Documentation/SubmittingPatches:
| 11) Include PATCH in the subject
|
| Due to high e-mail traffic to Linus, and to linux-kernel, it is common
| convention to prefix your subject line with [PATCH]. This lets Linus
| and other kernel developers more easily distinguish patches from other
| e-mail discussions.
Note that all of the technical problems we noted need to be fixed before
the next resubmission, not just some.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists