| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-id: <20131004120400.397019e4@amdc308.digital.local>
Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 12:04:00 +0200
From: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com>
To: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@...com>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@...sung.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Jonghwa Lee <jonghwa3.lee@...sung.com>,
Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...ess.pl>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>,
Myungjoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] thermal: exynos: Provide separate TMU data for
Exynos4412
Hi Eduardo,
> Lukasz,
>
> Just minor comments.
>
> On 24-09-2013 04:08, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> > Up till now Exynos5250 and Exynos4412 had the same definitions for
> > TMU data. Following commit changes that, by introducing separate
> > exynos4412_default_tmu_data structure.
> >
> > Since Exynos4412 was chronologically first, the corresponding name
> > for TMU registers and default data was renamed.
> >
> > Additionally, new SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS4412 type has been defined.
>
> It is not clear the objective of the patch itself. Was it just to make
> the code more readable or are you fixing something?
I'm fixing thermal on EXYNOS4412 device (trats2). The problem here is
to do it properly, since on the current code EXYNOS4412 and EXYNOS5250
uses the same configuration data.
To fix this problem, I had to split them. Also chronologically the
THERMAL IP first appeared on EXYNOS4412, not EXYNOS5250.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c | 7 ++++---
> > drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.h | 1 +
> > drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu_data.c | 26
> > ++++++++++++++++++++------
> > drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu_data.h | 9 ++++++++- 4 files
> > changed, 33 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> > b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c index b43afda..a858cc4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> > @@ -488,7 +488,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id
> > exynos_tmu_match[] = { },
> > {
> > .compatible = "samsung,exynos4412-tmu",
> > - .data = (void *)EXYNOS5250_TMU_DRV_DATA,
> > + .data = (void *)EXYNOS4412_TMU_DRV_DATA,
> > },
> > {
> > .compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-tmu",
> > @@ -630,8 +630,9 @@ static int exynos_tmu_probe(struct
> > platform_device *pdev) return ret;
> >
> > if (pdata->type == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS ||
> > - pdata->type == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS4210 ||
> > - pdata->type == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5440)
> > + pdata->type == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS4210 ||
> > + pdata->type == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS4412 ||
> > + pdata->type == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5440)
> > data->soc = pdata->type;
> > else {
> > ret = -EINVAL;
> > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.h
> > b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.h index b364c9e..db37df0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.h
> > +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.h
> > @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ enum calibration_mode {
> >
> > enum soc_type {
> > SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS4210 = 1,
> > + SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS4412,
> > SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS,
> > SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5440,
> > };
>
> I believe the above enum needs some documentation. SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS
> seams to be a bit confusing.
This is fixed at patch 4/6 of the series.
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu_data.c
> > b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu_data.c index 9002499..bd08093
> > 100644 --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu_data.c
> > +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu_data.c
> > @@ -90,8 +90,8 @@ struct exynos_tmu_init_data const
> > exynos4210_default_tmu_data = { };
> > #endif
> >
> > -#if defined(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5250) ||
> > defined(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS4412) -static const struct
> > exynos_tmu_registers exynos5250_tmu_registers = { +#if
> > defined(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS4412) || defined(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5250)
> > +static const struct exynos_tmu_registers exynos4412_tmu_registers
> > = { .triminfo_data = EXYNOS_TMU_REG_TRIMINFO, .triminfo_25_shift =
> > EXYNOS_TRIMINFO_25_SHIFT, .triminfo_85_shift =
> > EXYNOS_TRIMINFO_85_SHIFT, @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ static const struct
> > exynos_tmu_registers exynos5250_tmu_registers = { .emul_time_mask =
> > EXYNOS_EMUL_TIME_MASK, };
> >
> > -#define EXYNOS5250_TMU_DATA \
> > +#define EXYNOS4412_TMU_DATA \
> > .threshold_falling = 10, \
> > .trigger_levels[0] = 85, \
> > .trigger_levels[1] = 103, \
> > @@ -162,15 +162,29 @@ static const struct exynos_tmu_registers
> > exynos5250_tmu_registers = { .temp_level = 103, \
> > }, \
> > .freq_tab_count = 2, \
> > - .type = SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS, \
> > - .registers = &exynos5250_tmu_registers, \
> > + .registers = &exynos4412_tmu_registers, \
> > .features = (TMU_SUPPORT_EMULATION |
> > TMU_SUPPORT_TRIM_RELOAD | \ TMU_SUPPORT_FALLING_TRIP |
> > TMU_SUPPORT_READY_STATUS | \ TMU_SUPPORT_EMUL_TIME)
> > +#endif
> >
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS4412)
> > +struct exynos_tmu_init_data const exynos4412_default_tmu_data = {
> > + .tmu_data = {
> > + { EXYNOS4412_TMU_DATA,
> > + .type = SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS4412,
> > + },
> > + },
> > + .tmu_count = 1,
> > +};
> > +#endif
> > +
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5250)
> > struct exynos_tmu_init_data const exynos5250_default_tmu_data = {
> > .tmu_data = {
> > - { EXYNOS5250_TMU_DATA },
> > + { EXYNOS4412_TMU_DATA,
> > + .type = SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS,
> > + },
>
> Please add a comment on this initialization, specially because we
> start to mix macros with inline initialization. Starts to be hard to
> follow.
>
> Besides, I believe
> + {
> + EXYNOS4412_TMU_DATA,
> + .type = SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS,
> + },
>
> is a much more common style.
Ok.
>
>
> > },
> > .tmu_count = 1,
> > };
> > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu_data.h
> > b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu_data.h index dc7feb5..b130b1e
> > 100644 --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu_data.h
> > +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu_data.h
> > @@ -138,7 +138,14 @@ extern struct exynos_tmu_init_data const
> > exynos4210_default_tmu_data; #define EXYNOS4210_TMU_DRV_DATA (NULL)
> > #endif
> >
> > -#if (defined(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5250) ||
> > defined(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS4412)) +#if defined(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS4412)
> > +extern struct exynos_tmu_init_data const
> > exynos4412_default_tmu_data; +#define EXYNOS4412_TMU_DRV_DATA
> > (&exynos4412_default_tmu_data) +#else
> > +#define EXYNOS4412_TMU_DRV_DATA (NULL)
> > +#endif
> > +
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5250)
> > extern struct exynos_tmu_init_data const
> > exynos5250_default_tmu_data; #define EXYNOS5250_TMU_DRV_DATA
> > (&exynos5250_default_tmu_data) #else
> >
>
>
--
Best regards,
Lukasz Majewski
Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists