linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131004102839.GJ27287@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Fri, 4 Oct 2013 11:28:39 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 3

On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 10:23:39PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 10/03/2013 06:02 PM, Mark Brown wrote:

> >Due to the length of time taken to run all the allmodconfigs I skipped
> >the defconfig tests; I know Olof has the ARM stuff covered in his
> >autobuilder.  I'm going to use allyesconfig tomorrow since that should
> >run faster so hopefully I can cover the ARM, i386 and x86_64 configs
> >again.

> I could try to set up the buildbot farm I am using for -stable candidates
> to also test the -next tree. Would that help ?

Yes, that'd be great.  Like Olof said ARM is pretty well covered but
adding more platforms would be very helpful.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)