[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131004105535.GH3081@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 12:55:35 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, eranian@...gle.com,
andi@...stfloor.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] perf, x86: Reduce lbr_sel_map size
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 04:28:06PM +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote:
> From: "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@...el.com>
>
> Haswell has a new feature that utilizes the existing Last Branch Record
> facility to record call chains. When the feature is enabled, function
> call will be collected as normal, but as return instructions are executed
> the last captured branch record is popped from the on-chip LBR registers.
> The LBR call stack facility can help perf to get call chains of progam
> without frame pointer. When perf tool requests PERF_SAMPLE_CALLCHAIN +
> PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_USER, this feature is dynamically enabled by default.
> This feature can be disabled/enabled through an attribute file in the cpu
> pmu sysfs directory.
>
> The main change since previous patch series is:
> Patch 3 introduces PMU context switch callback, and uses the callback to
> unify the flush branch stack codeo.
>
> Patch 4 uses the context switch callback to save/restore the LBR stack.
>From what I can tell this is the exact same drivel I rejected earlier.
Same shitty changelogs, same shitty code.
Do not waste my time like this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists