[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131004152524.GA2265@ghostprotocols.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 12:25:24 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf session: Fix infinite loop on invalid perf.data file
Em Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 10:59:06AM -0600, David Ahern escreveu:
> On 10/1/13 10:54 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >Em Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 05:33:09PM +0200, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
> >>* David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com> wrote:
> >>>On 10/1/13 8:21 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >I liked this last one:
> >
> >> WARNING: The perf.data file's data size field is 0 which is unexpected.
> >> Was the 'perf record' command properly terminated?
> >
> >Can I patch that up into Namhyung's latest patch?
> >
> >Sonny, David, from your replies I think I can add Tested-by: tags for
> >both of you?
>
> I'm fine with the last message. And yes a Tested by
Got to process this now, changing it a bit to replace "perf.data" with
"%s" + session->filename, ack?
Otherwise the user may have a 'perf.data' file and despite having
informed -i with a different file name still get confused... ;-)
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists