| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 09:36:54 -0700
From: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
len.brown@...el.com, rjw@...k.pl, arjan@...ux.intel.com,
jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/6] x86/msr: add 64bit _on_cpu access functions
From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
Having 64-bit MSR access methods on given CPU can avoid shifting and
simplify MSR content manipulation. We already have other combinations
of rdmsrl_xxx and wrmsrl_xxx but missing the _on_cpu version.
Reviewed-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++
arch/x86/lib/msr-smp.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 84 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
index cb75028..e139b13 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
@@ -218,10 +218,14 @@ void msrs_free(struct msr *msrs);
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
int rdmsr_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 *l, u32 *h);
int wrmsr_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 l, u32 h);
+int rdmsrl_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u64 *q);
+int wrmsrl_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u64 q);
void rdmsr_on_cpus(const struct cpumask *mask, u32 msr_no, struct msr *msrs);
void wrmsr_on_cpus(const struct cpumask *mask, u32 msr_no, struct msr *msrs);
int rdmsr_safe_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 *l, u32 *h);
int wrmsr_safe_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 l, u32 h);
+int rdmsrl_safe_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u64 *q);
+int wrmsrl_safe_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u64 q);
int rdmsr_safe_regs_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 regs[8]);
int wrmsr_safe_regs_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 regs[8]);
#else /* CONFIG_SMP */
@@ -235,6 +239,16 @@ static inline int wrmsr_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 l, u32 h)
wrmsr(msr_no, l, h);
return 0;
}
+static inline int rdmsrl_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u64 *q)
+{
+ rdmsrl(msr_no, *q);
+ return 0;
+}
+static inline int wrmsrl_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u64 q)
+{
+ wrmsrl(msr_no, q);
+ return 0;
+}
static inline void rdmsr_on_cpus(const struct cpumask *m, u32 msr_no,
struct msr *msrs)
{
@@ -254,6 +268,14 @@ static inline int wrmsr_safe_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 l, u32 h)
{
return wrmsr_safe(msr_no, l, h);
}
+static inline int rdmsrl_safe_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u64 *q)
+{
+ return rdmsrl_safe(msr_no, q);
+}
+static inline int wrmsrl_safe_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u64 q)
+{
+ return wrmsrl_safe(msr_no, q);
+}
static inline int rdmsr_safe_regs_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 regs[8])
{
return rdmsr_safe_regs(regs);
diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/msr-smp.c b/arch/x86/lib/msr-smp.c
index a6b1b86..518532e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/msr-smp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/msr-smp.c
@@ -47,6 +47,21 @@ int rdmsr_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 *l, u32 *h)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdmsr_on_cpu);
+int rdmsrl_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u64 *q)
+{
+ int err;
+ struct msr_info rv;
+
+ memset(&rv, 0, sizeof(rv));
+
+ rv.msr_no = msr_no;
+ err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, __rdmsr_on_cpu, &rv, 1);
+ *q = rv.reg.q;
+
+ return err;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdmsrl_on_cpu);
+
int wrmsr_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 l, u32 h)
{
int err;
@@ -63,6 +78,22 @@ int wrmsr_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 l, u32 h)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(wrmsr_on_cpu);
+int wrmsrl_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u64 q)
+{
+ int err;
+ struct msr_info rv;
+
+ memset(&rv, 0, sizeof(rv));
+
+ rv.msr_no = msr_no;
+ rv.reg.q = q;
+
+ err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, __wrmsr_on_cpu, &rv, 1);
+
+ return err;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(wrmsrl_on_cpu);
+
static void __rwmsr_on_cpus(const struct cpumask *mask, u32 msr_no,
struct msr *msrs,
void (*msr_func) (void *info))
@@ -159,6 +190,37 @@ int wrmsr_safe_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 l, u32 h)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(wrmsr_safe_on_cpu);
+int wrmsrl_safe_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u64 q)
+{
+ int err;
+ struct msr_info rv;
+
+ memset(&rv, 0, sizeof(rv));
+
+ rv.msr_no = msr_no;
+ rv.reg.q = q;
+
+ err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, __wrmsr_safe_on_cpu, &rv, 1);
+
+ return err ? err : rv.err;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(wrmsrl_safe_on_cpu);
+
+int rdmsrl_safe_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u64 *q)
+{
+ int err;
+ struct msr_info rv;
+
+ memset(&rv, 0, sizeof(rv));
+
+ rv.msr_no = msr_no;
+ err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, __rdmsr_safe_on_cpu, &rv, 1);
+ *q = rv.reg.q;
+
+ return err ? err : rv.err;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdmsrl_safe_on_cpu);
+
/*
* These variants are significantly slower, but allows control over
* the entire 32-bit GPR set.
--
1.8.3.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists