linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/2] gpiolib: let gpiod_request() return -EPROBE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1380909598-6382-2-git-send-email-acourbot@nvidia.com>
Date:	Fri, 4 Oct 2013 10:59:58 -0700
From:	Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
To:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC:	"Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>,
	<linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<gnurou@...il.com>, Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] gpiolib: let gpiod_request() return -EPROBE_DEFER

Patch be1a4b brought some improvements to the GPIO error handling code,
but also changed the return value of gpiod_request() when called on a
not yet initialized GPIO descriptor: it now returns -EINVAL instead of
-EPROBE_DEFER, and this affects some drivers.

This patch restores the original behavior for gpiod_request(). It is
safe to do so now that desc_to_gpio() does not rely on the GPIO
descriptor to be initialized. Other functions changed by patch be1a4b
do not see their return value affected, so these are not reverted.

Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
Reported-by: Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@...delico.com>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index f330631..0dee0e0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -1398,7 +1398,7 @@ static int gpiod_request(struct gpio_desc *desc, const char *label)
 	int			status = -EPROBE_DEFER;
 	unsigned long		flags;
 
-	if (!desc || !desc->chip) {
+	if (!desc) {
 		pr_warn("%s: invalid GPIO\n", __func__);
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
@@ -1406,6 +1406,8 @@ static int gpiod_request(struct gpio_desc *desc, const char *label)
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags);
 
 	chip = desc->chip;
+	if (chip == NULL)
+		goto done;
 
 	if (!try_module_get(chip->owner))
 		goto done;
-- 
1.8.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/