[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1380910065.2081.117.camel@joe-AO722>
Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 11:07:45 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, len.brown@...el.com, rjw@...k.pl,
arjan@...ux.intel.com, jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] Introduce Intel RAPL power capping driver
On Fri, 2013-10-04 at 09:36 -0700, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> The Intel Running Average Power Limit(RAPL) technology provides platform
> software with the ability to monitor, control, and get notifications on
> power usage.
[]
> diff --git a/drivers/powercap/Makefile b/drivers/powercap/Makefile
[]
> +/* bitmasks for RAPL MSRs, used by primitive access functions */
> +#define ENERGY_STATUS_MASK 0xffffffff
> +
> +#define POWER_LIMIT1_MASK 0x7FFF
> +#define POWER_LIMIT1_ENABLE BIT(15)
> +#define POWER_LIMIT1_CLAMP BIT(16)
> +
> +#define POWER_LIMIT2_MASK (0x7FFFULL<<32)
> +#define POWER_LIMIT2_ENABLE BIT_ULL(47)
> +#define POWER_LIMIT2_CLAMP BIT_ULL(48)
> +#define POWER_PACKAGE_LOCK BIT_ULL(63)
> +#define POWER_PP_LOCK BIT(31)
> +
> +#define TIME_WINDOW1_MASK (0x7F<<17)
> +#define TIME_WINDOW2_MASK (0x7FULL<<49)
Is there a reason why these masks aren't all ULL?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists