linux-kernel - [PATCH 0/5] rcusync: validations + dtor + exclusive

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131004184614.GA17536@redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 4 Oct 2013 20:46:14 +0200
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/5] rcusync: validations + dtor + exclusive

Hello.

On top of Peter's "[PATCH 0/3] Optimize the cpu hotplug locking"
series.

It seems that Paul and Peter agree with 1-3, and they are simple.

4-5 should be ignored without the explicit ack. Peter seems to
dislike the exclusive mode. I disagree but I am not going to argue.
(well, at least right now ;)

Oleg.

 include/linux/rcusync.h |   80 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 kernel/cpu.c            |    2 +-
 kernel/rcusync.c        |   98 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 3 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/