[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131004023812.GC3417@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 19:38:12 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
"shuahkhan@...il.com" <shuahkhan@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [ 00/16] 3.4.65-stable review
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 06:24:05PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 10/02/2013 10:05 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.4.65 release.
> >There are 16 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> >to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> >let me know.
> >
> >Responses should be made by Sat Oct 5 04:04:34 UTC 2013.
> >Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> >The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.4.65-rc1.gz
> >and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> >thanks,
> >
> >greg k-h
> >
>
> Patch testing: 3.4.65-rc1-rc1 patch applied with white-space
> warnings and 3.4.65-rc2 applied cleanly.
>
> Tested 3.4.65-rc1 and 3.4.65-rc2.
> Compile testing: 3.4.65-rc1 and 3.4.65-rc2. Passed
> Boot testing: 3.4.65-rc1 and 3.4.65-rc2. Passed
> dmesg regression testing: passed. dmesgs look good. No regressions
> compared to the previous dmesgs for this release. dmesg emerg, crit,
> alert, err are clean. No regressions in warn.
Thanks for testing both of these.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists