[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20131004142517.590a96bcb63330313ceb5298@ops.dti.ne.jp>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 14:25:17 +0900
From: takasi-y@....dti.ne.jp
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc: SH-Linux <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>, ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk,
Shinya Kuribayashi <shinya.kuribayashi.px@...esas.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] sh: clkfwk: Select sh-/common- clkfwk alternatively
Hi Laurent,
> While I agree with this patch, I believe the use of the HAVE_MACH_CLKDEV
> configuration option to select whether to compile core.o in is a bit of an
> abuse. <snip>
Well, yes, indeed. It does not mean having include/mach/clkdev.h,
but means somewhat such like !COMMON_CLK.
# I think there is similar usage in arch/mips, though they define but not use.
# ... is an execution.
> However, as all ARCH_SHMOBILE platforms should be converted to the common
> clock framework, this is only temporary and could be revisited later, so I'm
> fine with keeping the patch as-is.
Sure.
Thank you for your review.
/yoshii
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists