linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] PCI/PM: Removing the function pci_pm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4130856.aaSGkRrri4@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:	Sun, 06 Oct 2013 00:47:36 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Cc:	Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>,
	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	fei.li@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/PM: Removing the function pci_pm_complete()

On Friday, October 04, 2013 11:47:25 AM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 4:46 AM, Chuansheng Liu
> <chuansheng.liu@...el.com> wrote:
> >
> > Commit(88d2613) removed the pm_runtime_put_sync() from pci_pm_complete()
> > to PM core code device_complete().
> >
> > Here the pci_pm_complete() is doing the same work which can be done in
> > device_complete(), so we can remove it directly.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: liu chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/pci-driver.c |    9 ---------
> >  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> This looks correct to me, but I'd like Rafael to ack it before I apply it.

Yes, it should work, so ACK.

Sorry for the delay.

> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> > index 98f7b9b..736ef3f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> > @@ -599,18 +599,10 @@ static int pci_pm_prepare(struct device *dev)
> >         return error;
> >  }
> >
> > -static void pci_pm_complete(struct device *dev)
> > -{
> > -       struct device_driver *drv = dev->driver;
> > -
> > -       if (drv && drv->pm && drv->pm->complete)
> > -               drv->pm->complete(dev);
> > -}
> >
> >  #else /* !CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */
> >
> >  #define pci_pm_prepare NULL
> > -#define pci_pm_complete        NULL
> >
> >  #endif /* !CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */
> >
> > @@ -1123,7 +1115,6 @@ static int pci_pm_runtime_idle(struct device *dev)
> >
> >  const struct dev_pm_ops pci_dev_pm_ops = {
> >         .prepare = pci_pm_prepare,
> > -       .complete = pci_pm_complete,
> >         .suspend = pci_pm_suspend,
> >         .resume = pci_pm_resume,
> >         .freeze = pci_pm_freeze,
> > --
> > 1.7.0.4

Thanks!

-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/