[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131005140636.GA25076@order.stressinduktion.org>
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2013 16:06:36 +0200
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To: Oussama Ghorbel <ou.ghorbel@...il.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix the upper MTU limit in ipv6 GRE tunnel
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 10:52:13AM +0100, Oussama Ghorbel wrote:
> Unlike ipv4, the struct member hlen holds the length of the GRE and ipv6
> headers. This length is also counted in dev->hard_header_len.
> Perhaps, it's more clean to modify the hlen to count only the GRE header
> without ipv6 header as the variable name suggest, but the simple way to fix
> this without regression risk is simply modify the calculation of the limit
> in ip6gre_tunnel_change_mtu function.
> Verified in kernel version v3.11.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oussama Ghorbel <ou.ghorbel@...il.com>
> ---
> net/ipv6/ip6_gre.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_gre.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_gre.c
> index 90747f1..41487ab 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/ip6_gre.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_gre.c
> @@ -1175,9 +1175,8 @@ done:
>
> static int ip6gre_tunnel_change_mtu(struct net_device *dev, int new_mtu)
> {
> - struct ip6_tnl *tunnel = netdev_priv(dev);
> if (new_mtu < 68 ||
> - new_mtu > 0xFFF8 - dev->hard_header_len - tunnel->hlen)
> + new_mtu > 0xFFF8 - dev->hard_header_len)
> return -EINVAL;
> dev->mtu = new_mtu;
> return 0;
Hmmm...
dev->hard_header_len is initialized to LL_MAX_HEADER + sizeof(struct ipv6hdr)
+ 4 but won't include the additional head space needed for GRE_SEQ, GRE_KEY
etc. if at time of tunnel creation the routing table did not had a good guess
for the outgoing device.
To make this correct we would have to refactor the usage of the variables a
bit as is done in ipv4/ip_tunnel.c. The safest thing would be to leave this
check as-is currently although we exclude some allowed mtus.
Perhaps you want to take a look how to achieve that? ;)
Greetings,
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists