| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20131006213309.GO19510@leaf> Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2013 14:33:09 -0700 From: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org> To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch.pl: Check for the FSF mailing address On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 02:27:17PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > On Sun, 2013-10-06 at 14:18 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 11:27:39PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 11:51:48AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > > > On Sat, 2013-10-05 at 11:43 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > > > > > Kernel maintainers reject new instances of the GPL boilerplate paragraph > > > > > directing people to write to the FSF for a copy of the GPL, since the > > > > > FSF has moved in the past and may do so again. > [] > > any objections to merging the patch in its current form? > > Your own suggestion that this be applied only to > patches hasn't been implemented. Given Greg's comment that we want to eliminate the existing instances, I wanted to make sure implementing that change still makes sense. I can easily enough make checkpatch emit an ERROR for patches and a WARN or CHK for existing files, if that's the consensus. - Josh Triplett -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists