linux-kernel - Preferred line-break style around binary operators?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131006214829.GA20112@leaf>
Date:	Sun, 6 Oct 2013 14:48:29 -0700
From:	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
To:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Preferred line-break style around binary operators?

There are two common approaches to breaking long lines at binary
operators: breaking the line before the operator (putting the operator
at the start of the next line), or breaking the line after the operator
(putting the operator at the end of the previous line).

CodingStyle doesn't define any requirement here, and the kernel uses
both approaches; for instance, using && as a sample:

$ git grep -h '&&$' | wc -l
28872
$ git grep -h '^[[:space:]]*&&' | wc -l
4169

Which style should kernel code use?  I can submit a CodingStyle patch
documenting that preference for future reference.

- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/