[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <525283A5.4020904@citrix.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 10:49:25 +0100
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>
To: Frediano Ziglio <frediano.ziglio@...rix.com>
CC: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
<xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xen: Fix possible user space selector corruption
On 07/10/13 10:48, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> Due to the way kernel is initialized under Xen is possible that the
> ring1 selector used by the kernel for the boot cpu end up to be copied
> to userspace leading to segmentation fault in the userspace.
>
> Xen code in the kernel initialize no-boot cpus with correct selectors (ds
> and es set to __USER_DS) but the boot one keep the ring1 (passed by Xen).
> On task context switch (switch_to) we assume that ds, es and cs already
> point to __USER_DS and __KERNEL_CSso these selector are not changed.
>
> If processor is an Intel that support sysenter instruction sysenter/sysexit
> is used so ds and es are not restored switching back from kernel to
> userspace. In the case the selectors point to a ring1 instead of __USER_DS
> the userspace code will crash on first memory access attempt (to be
> precise Xen on the emulated iret used to do sysexit will detect and set ds
> and es to zero which lead to GPF anyway).
>
> Now if an userspace process call kernel using sysenter and get rescheduled
> (for me it happen on a specific init calling wait4) could happen that the
> ring1 selector is set to ds and es.
>
> This is quite hard to detect cause after a while these selectors are fixed
> (__USER_DS seems sticky).
>
> Bisecting the code commit 7076aada1040de4ed79a5977dbabdb5e5ea5e249 appears
> to be the first one that have this issue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio <frediano.ziglio@...rix.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/xen/smp.c | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
>
> Just changed comment on source code as suggested by Andrew Cooper.
>
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/smp.c b/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
> index d99cae8..6d89fcc 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
> @@ -245,6 +245,15 @@ static void __init xen_smp_prepare_boot_cpu(void)
> old memory can be recycled */
> make_lowmem_page_readwrite(xen_initial_gdt);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> + /*
> + * Xen starts us with XEN_FLAT_RING1_DS, but linux code
> + * expects __USER_DS
> + */
> + loadsegment(ds, __USER_DS);
> + loadsegment(es, __USER_DS);
> +#endif
> +
> xen_filter_cpu_maps();
> xen_setup_vcpu_info_placement();
> }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists