[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACmBeS0G=GVVZiTNEovq0PtfZrr-L7rskyGOrpY12=6fgesyWg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 15:42:40 +0200
From: Jonas Jensen <jonas.jensen@...il.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"arm@...nel.org" <arm@...nel.org>,
"vinod.koul@...el.com" <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
"djbw@...com" <djbw@...com>, "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8] dmaengine: Add MOXA ART DMA engine driver
Hi Mark,
Thanks for the replies. Please have a look at v9.
On 7 August 2013 17:13, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> wrote:
>> +
>> + ret = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, moxart_dma_interrupt, 0,
>> + "moxart-dma-engine", mdc);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "devm_request_irq failed\n");
>
> Do you not need calls to of_dma_controller_free and
> dma_async_device_unregister here? I'm not all that familiar with the DMA
> API, so maybe you don't.
Yes. I see now, I should have moved both dma_async_device_register()
and of_dma_controller_register() to happen after devm_request_irq().
I'll include that in next version.
>> +static int moxart_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct moxart_dma_container *m = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
>
> Similarly, do you not need to call of_dma_controller free here?
Yes, this is now done.
Best regards,
Jonas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists