[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <1588308.i5Ha5A8RHe@amdc1032>
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 16:10:29 +0200
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
To: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@...com>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal: offer TI thermal support only when ARCH_OMAP2PLUS
is defined
On Monday, October 07, 2013 12:50:54 PM Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Monday, October 07, 2013 11:57:16 AM Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Friday, October 04, 2013 02:22:30 PM Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> > > On 04-10-2013 08:35, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > > Menu for Texas Instruments thermal support is visible on all
> > > > platforms and TI_SOC_THERMAL + TI_THERMAL config options can
> > > > be selected also on EXYNOS platform (on which ARCH_HAS_BANDGAP
> > > > config option is selected by SoCs config options to fulfill
> > > > EXYNOS_THERMAL config option dependency). Thus the code which
> > > > is never used can be build. Fix it by making TI menu dependent
> > > > on ARCH_OMAP2PLUS config option.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/thermal/Kconfig | 1 +
> > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/Kconfig b/drivers/thermal/Kconfig
> > > > index 57e06a9..a709c63 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/thermal/Kconfig
> > > > +++ b/drivers/thermal/Kconfig
> > > > @@ -193,6 +193,7 @@ config X86_PKG_TEMP_THERMAL
> > > > notification methods.
> > > >
> > > > menu "Texas Instruments thermal drivers"
> > > > +depends on ARCH_OMAP2PLUS
> > >
> > > No, this driver is not for ARCH_OMAP*, but for TI bandgap, with the
> > > option to offer thermal control. So, the HW supported is TI bandgap IP,
> > > not ARCH_OMAP*. It happens to be so that OMAP2PLUS all have a
> > > (different) version of this device.
> > >
> > > However, DRA7 devices, for instance, also feature the bandgap IP
> > > (different version of those present in OMAP devices), and it is not
> > > ARCH_OMAP2PLUS.
> >
> > Then you have wrong dependencies anyway since ARCH_BANDGAP is selected
>
> s/ARCH_BANDGAP/ARCH_HAS_BANDGAP/
>
> > currently only by ARCH_OMAP2PLUS and EXYNOS SoCs.
It seems that SOC_DRA7xx config option is dependent on ARCH_OMAP2PLUS one
*anyway* (thus it doesn't need to select ARCH_HAS_BANDGAP on its own). Thus
my patch is correct and sufficient for the current TI bandgap IP support.
if ARCH_OMAP2PLUS
menu "TI OMAP2/3/4 Specific Features"
config ARCH_OMAP2PLUS_TYPICAL
bool "Typical OMAP configuration"
default y
select AEABI
select HIGHMEM
select I2C
select I2C_OMAP
select MENELAUS if ARCH_OMAP2
select NEON if CPU_V7
select PM_RUNTIME
select REGULATOR
select TWL4030_CORE if ARCH_OMAP3 || ARCH_OMAP4
select TWL4030_POWER if ARCH_OMAP3 || ARCH_OMAP4
select VFP
help
Compile a kernel suitable for booting most boards
config SOC_HAS_OMAP2_SDRC
bool "OMAP2 SDRAM Controller support"
config SOC_HAS_REALTIME_COUNTER
bool "Real time free running counter"
depends on SOC_OMAP5 || SOC_DRA7XX
default y
config SOC_DRA7XX
bool "TI DRA7XX"
select ARM_ARCH_TIMER
select CPU_V7
select ARM_GIC
select HAVE_SMP
select COMMON_CLK
...
Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig (next-20130927):
> >
> > config ARCH_OMAP2PLUS
> > bool
> > select ARCH_HAS_BANDGAP
> > select ARCH_HAS_CPUFREQ
> > select ARCH_HAS_HOLES_MEMORYMODEL
> > select ARCH_OMAP
> > select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB
> > select CLKDEV_LOOKUP
> > select CLKSRC_MMIO
> > select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
> > select GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP
> > select HAVE_CLK
> > select OMAP_DM_TIMER
> > select PINCTRL
> > select PROC_DEVICETREE if PROC_FS
> > select SOC_BUS
> > select SPARSE_IRQ
> > select TI_PRIV_EDMA
> > select USE_OF
> > help
> > Systems based on OMAP2, OMAP3, OMAP4 or OMAP5
> >
> > drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/Kconfig (next-20130927):
> >
> > config TI_SOC_THERMAL
> > tristate "Texas Instruments SoCs temperature sensor driver"
> > depends on THERMAL
> > depends on ARCH_HAS_BANDGAP
> > help
> > If you say yes here you get support for the Texas Instruments
> > OMAP4460+ on die bandgap temperature sensor support. The register
> > set is part of system control module.
> >
> > This includes alert interrupts generation and also the TSHUT
> > support.
>
> and for EXYNOS it looks like that (next-20130927):
>
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig:
>
> config CPU_EXYNOS4210
> bool "SAMSUNG EXYNOS4210"
> default y
> depends on ARCH_EXYNOS4
> select ARCH_HAS_BANDGAP
> select ARM_CPU_SUSPEND if PM
> select PINCTRL_EXYNOS
> select PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS if PM
> select S5P_PM if PM
> select S5P_SLEEP if PM
> select SAMSUNG_DMADEV
> help
> Enable EXYNOS4210 CPU support
>
> config SOC_EXYNOS4212
> bool "SAMSUNG EXYNOS4212"
> default y
> depends on ARCH_EXYNOS4
> select ARCH_HAS_BANDGAP
> select PINCTRL_EXYNOS
> select PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS if PM
> select S5P_PM if PM
> select S5P_SLEEP if PM
> select SAMSUNG_DMADEV
> help
> Enable EXYNOS4212 SoC support
>
> config SOC_EXYNOS4412
> bool "SAMSUNG EXYNOS4412"
> default y
> depends on ARCH_EXYNOS4
> select ARCH_HAS_BANDGAP
> select PINCTRL_EXYNOS
> select PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS if PM
> select SAMSUNG_DMADEV
> help
> Enable EXYNOS4412 SoC support
>
> config SOC_EXYNOS5250
> bool "SAMSUNG EXYNOS5250"
> default y
> depends on ARCH_EXYNOS5
> select ARCH_HAS_BANDGAP
> select PINCTRL_EXYNOS
> select PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS if PM
> select S5P_PM if PM
> select S5P_SLEEP if PM
> select S5P_DEV_MFC
> select SAMSUNG_DMADEV
> help
> Enable EXYNOS5250 SoC support
>
> config SOC_EXYNOS5420
> bool "SAMSUNG EXYNOS5420"
> default y
> depends on ARCH_EXYNOS5
> select PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS if PM
> select S5P_PM if PM
> select S5P_SLEEP if PM
> help
> Enable EXYNOS5420 SoC support
>
> config SOC_EXYNOS5440
> bool "SAMSUNG EXYNOS5440"
> default y
> depends on ARCH_EXYNOS5
> select ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT if ARM_LPAE
> select ARCH_HAS_BANDGAP
> select ARCH_HAS_OPP
> select HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER
> select AUTO_ZRELADDR
> select MIGHT_HAVE_PCI
> select PCI_DOMAINS if PCI
> select PINCTRL_EXYNOS5440
> select PM_OPP
> help
> Enable EXYNOS5440 SoC support
>
> drivers/thermal/Kconfig:
>
> menu "Samsung thermal drivers"
> depends on PLAT_SAMSUNG
> source "drivers/thermal/samsung/Kconfig"
> endmenu
>
> drivers/thermal/samsung/Kconfig
>
> config EXYNOS_THERMAL
> tristate "Exynos thermal management unit driver"
> depends on ARCH_HAS_BANDGAP && OF
> help
> If you say yes here you get support for the TMU (Thermal Management
> Unit) driver for SAMSUNG EXYNOS series of SoCs. This driver initialises
> the TMU, reports temperature and handles cooling action if defined.
> This driver uses the Exynos core thermal APIs and TMU configuration
> data from the supported SoCs.
>
>
> > > And because of that, the design of this driver is different. It is not
> > > expected to depend on an arch, but the arch code is expected to select
> > > ARCH_HAS_BANDGAP.
> >
> > There should be additional dependencies beside ARCH_BANDGAP, i.e. on
>
> s/ARCH_BANDGAP/ARCH_HAS_BANDGAP/
>
> > EXYNOS platforms we currently also have dependency on PLAT_SAMSUNG
> > (should be ARCH_EXYNOS instead, my other patch fixes it).
> >
> > > > source "drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/Kconfig"
> > > > endmenu
> >
> > Best regards,
> > --
> > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
> > Samsung R&D Institute Poland
> > Samsung Electronics
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
> Samsung R&D Institute Poland
> Samsung Electronics
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists