linux-kernel - [PATCH v10 19/20] iommu/exynos: return 0 if iommu_attach

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <20131007105834.8373e2d380e309928bdc8e09@samsung.com>
Date:	Mon, 07 Oct 2013 10:58:34 +0900
From:	Cho KyongHo <pullip.cho@...sung.com>
To:	Linux ARM Kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Linux DeviceTree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux IOMMU <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Samsung SOC <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	Antonios Motakis <a.motakis@...tualopensystems.com>,
	Grant Grundler <grundler@...omium.org>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	Prathyush <prathyush.k@...sung.com>,
	Rahul Sharma <rahul.sharma@...sung.com>,
	Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>,
	Subash Patel <supash.ramaswamy@...aro.org>,
	Varun Sethi <Varun.Sethi@...escale.com>,
	Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
	Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>
Subject: [PATCH v10 19/20] iommu/exynos: return 0 if iommu_attach_device()
 successes

iommu_attach_device() against exynos-iommu positive integer on success
if the caller calls iommu_attach_device() with the same iommu_domain
multiple times without call to iommu_detach_device() to inform the
caller how many calls to iommu_detach_device() to really detach iommu.

However the convention of the return value of success of common API is
zero, this patch makes iommu_attach_device() call against exynos-iommu
always return zero if the given device is successfully attached to
the given iommu_domain even though it is already attached to the same
iommu_domain.

Reviewed-by: Grant Grundler <grundler@...omium.org>
Signed-off-by: Cho KyongHo <pullip.cho@...sung.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c |   13 +++++++------
 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c
index 26ba554..5025338 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c
@@ -759,15 +759,16 @@ static int exynos_iommu_attach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
 
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
 
-	if (ret < 0)
+	if (ret < 0) {
 		dev_err(dev, "%s: Failed to attach IOMMU with pgtable %#lx\n",
 				__func__, __pa(priv->pgtable));
-	else
-		dev_dbg(dev, "%s: Attached IOMMU with pgtable 0x%lx%s\n",
-					__func__, __pa(priv->pgtable),
-					(ret == 0) ? "" : ", again");
+		return ret;
+	}
 
-	return ret;
+	dev_dbg(dev, "%s: Attached IOMMU with pgtable 0x%lx%s\n",
+		__func__, __pa(priv->pgtable), (ret == 0) ? "" : ", again");
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static void exynos_iommu_detach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
-- 
1.7.2.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/