[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131007191835.GA28737@jtriplet-mobl1>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 12:18:43 -0700
From: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
To: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, gregkh@...ux-foundation.org,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] checkpatch: Make the 80-character limit a --strict check
only
The 80-character limit is not a hard-and-fast rule, nor should it be
applied blindly by people running checkpatch and fixing its warnings.
Sometimes it's better to violate the 80-character "limit" in the name of
readability, and when it isn't, it's often better to refactor into a
function or otherwise restructure the code rather than just finding
increasingly awkward places to break lines.
Thus, change checkpatch's LONG_LINE warning to a --strict CHK instead.
Anyone wanting to use checkpatch to check for this can easily enough
enable --strict or turn on LONG_LINE explicitly, but it shouldn't be
part of the default warnings.
Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
---
scripts/checkpatch.pl | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index 47016c3..ed16a68 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -2017,8 +2017,8 @@ sub process {
$line =~ /^\+\s*"[^"]*"\s*(?:\s*|,|\)\s*;)\s*$/) &&
$length > $max_line_length)
{
- WARN("LONG_LINE",
- "line over $max_line_length characters\n" . $herecurr);
+ CHK("LONG_LINE",
+ "line over $max_line_length characters\n" . $herecurr);
}
# Check for user-visible strings broken across lines, which breaks the ability
--
1.8.4.rc3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists