[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1381181602.2081.214.camel@joe-AO722>
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 14:33:22 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, gregkh@...ux-foundation.org,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] checkpatch: Make the 80-character limit a --strict
check only
On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 22:23 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 12:34:33PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
>
> > I've seen far more examples of the 80-column limit making code less
> > readable rather than more. It's only really helpful when it forces code
> > restructuring, *not* when it just forces an arbitrary line break.
>
> So teach that piece of crap to complain about fucked-in-head line breaks like
> ret_val =
> leaf_shift_left(tb,
> tb->
> lnum
> [0],
> tb->
> lbytes
> -
> 1);
> in addition to obscenely long lines (and yes, it is a real-world example).
Yup, that's pretty ugly.
It was autogenerated and introduced when Linus
rather arbitrarily lindented the reiserfs code.
btw: I think lindent should be removed from scripts/
http://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/11/390
I believe reiserfs was originally set to a 132
column width maximum.
commit bd4c625c061c2a38568d0add3478f59172455159
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...osdl.org>
Date: Tue Jul 12 20:21:28 2005 -0700
reiserfs: run scripts/Lindent on reiserfs code
This was a pure indentation change, using:
scripts/Lindent fs/reiserfs/*.c include/linux/reiserfs_*.h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists