[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <525347BE.7040606@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 16:46:06 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
Robert Love <rlove@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
Andrea Righi <andrea@...terlinux.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mike Hommey <mh@...ndium.org>, Taras Glek <tglek@...illa.com>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@...il.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/14] vrange: Add new vrange(2) system call
On 10/07/2013 04:41 PM, John Stultz wrote:
>
> You mark a chunk of memory as volatile, then at some point later, mark
> its as non-volatile. The purge state tells you if the memory is still
> there, or if we threw it out due to memory pressure. This lets the
> application regnerate the purged data before continuing on.
>
And wouldn't this apply to MADV_DONTNEED just as well? Perhaps what we
should do is an enhanced madvise() call?
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists