linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 05/14] vrange: Add new vrange(2) system call

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131008071202.GB29509@bbox>
Date:	Tue, 8 Oct 2013 16:12:02 +0900
From:	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
To:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
	Robert Love <rlove@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
	Andrea Righi <andrea@...terlinux.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Mike Hommey <mh@...ndium.org>, Taras Glek <tglek@...illa.com>,
	Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@...il.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
	Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/14] vrange: Add new vrange(2) system call

On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 12:35:33AM -0400, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> (10/7/13 11:07 PM), Minchan Kim wrote:
> >Hi KOSAKI,
> >
> >On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 10:51:18PM -0400, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> >>>Maybe, int madvise5(addr, length, MADV_DONTNEED|MADV_LAZY|MADV_SIGBUS,
> >>>         &purged, &ret);
> >>>
> >>>Another reason to make it hard is that madvise(2) is tight coupled with
> >>>with vmas split/merge. It needs mmap_sem's write-side lock and it hurt
> >>>anon-vrange test performance much heavily and userland might want to
> >>>make volatile range with small unit like "page size" so it's undesireable
> >>>to make it with vma. Then, we should filter out to avoid vma split/merge
> >>>in implementation if only MADV_LAZY case? Doable but it could make code
> >>>complicated and lost consistency with other variant of madvise.
> >>
> >>I haven't seen your performance test result. Could please point out URLs?
> >
> >https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/12/105
> 
> It's not comparison with and without vma merge. I'm interest how much benefit
> vmas operation avoiding have.

I had an number but lost it so I should set up it in my KVM machine :(
And I needed old kernel 3.7.0 for testing vma-based approach.

DRAM:2G, CPU : 12 

kernel 3.7.0

jemalloc: 20527 records/s
jemalloc vma based approach : 5360 records/s

vrange call made worse because every thread stuck with mmap_sem.

kernel 3.11.0

jemalloc: 21176 records/s
jemalloc vroot tree approach: 103637 records/s

It could enhance 5 times.

-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/