linux-kernel - Re: [raw v1 0/4] Replace __this_cpu ops with raw_cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 8 Oct 2013 09:27:43 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, akpm@...uxfoundation.org,
	Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [raw v1 0/4] Replace __this_cpu ops with raw_cpu_ops where
 necessary


* Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com> wrote:

> The kernel can detect __this_cpu ops in preemptible contexts after
> the preemption check patchset that I posted last week.
> 
> Here is a selection of patches to fix false positives caused by
> the additional checks. So far I have found no bug. Amazing.
> Looks like there was some prior work done to shake these things out?
> 
> I ran an upstream kernel using Ubuntu 13.04 + the preempt checking +
> the patches below on my desktop and with the following patches no
> __this_cpu ops triggered messages. The kernel had the default Ubuntu
> desktop configuration (+ CONFIG_PREEMPT + CONFIG_DEBUG_THIS_CPU_OPERATIONS).

Here are the current list of technical problems that still plague your 
submission:

 - see the technical questions I raised about the snmp patch

 - broken threading resulting in patches arriving out of order. (You
   ignored peterz's helpful suggestion to upgrade Quilt which would allow
   you to fix this.)

 - broken subject lines - no 'PATCH' for patches

 - inconsistent patch titles: broken, inconsistent subsystem tags, etc.

 - incomplete changelogs: you fail to quote the false positive that led 
   you to a change. In cases this results in a totally context-free
   changelog which loses information the moment it's committed upstream.

In particular the last 4 items were mentioned to you for your last 
submission - which you failed to fix. You should wait with your next 
submission until you have enough time to fix *all* problems that were 
reported to you, not just some.

All in one, still a sloppy, incomplete submission.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/