[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131008081558.GB6706@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 10:15:58 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 26/50] tools/perf/build: Split out feature check: 'libbfd'
* Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 09:11:15AM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> > On 10/7/13 5:56 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >diff --git a/tools/perf/config/Makefile b/tools/perf/config/Makefile
> > >index 77a2e6b..4f60ecc 100644
> > >--- a/tools/perf/config/Makefile
> > >+++ b/tools/perf/config/Makefile
> > >@@ -121,6 +121,7 @@ FEATURE_TESTS = \
> > > libperl \
> > > libpython \
> > > libpython-version \
> > >+ libbfd \
> > > libnuma
> > >
> > > $(foreach test,$(FEATURE_TESTS),$(call feature_check,$(test),$(test)))
> >
> > strlcpy missing from FEATURE_TESTS, but really the strlcpy changes
> > should be a separate patch.
Indeed, that's an oversight.
> it gets removed completely in here:
> tools/perf: Turn strlcpy() into a __weak function
>
> still I think David's right and there should be
> separate patch for strlcpy check
Ok, I have created a separate patch for that, so that's logically
consistent.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists