[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131008093638.GO3081@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 11:36:38 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] perf: mmap2 not covering VM_CLONE regions
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 09:15:30AM +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> Yes, it is but I am trying to see whether or not we could unify that and
> use a single u64 number to uniquely identify each mapping.
No you cannot; two unrelated executables which have distinct mm_ids can
easily mmap() the same shared file.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists