linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10] dmaengine: Add MOXA ART DMA engine driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACmBeS1tYwJBGscOSC=F=oup_+WfYOZMW-Xu-UmD65KuKNxfQA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 8 Oct 2013 11:53:36 +0200
From:	Jonas Jensen <jonas.jensen@...il.com>
To:	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc:	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"arm@...nel.org" <arm@...nel.org>,
	"vinod.koul@...el.com" <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
	"djbw@...com" <djbw@...com>, "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
	"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10] dmaengine: Add MOXA ART DMA engine driver

On 7 October 2013 17:12, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> wrote:
> Sorry I didn't notice this previously, but "moxa" isn't in
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt (despite several
> bindings using it). Could you cook up a separate patch to add an entry
> for Moxa, please?

Yes, I'll submit a separate patch.

> Also, given the SoC is called "ART" it's a shame that we're calling this
> "moxa,moxart-dma" rather than "moxa,art-dma". We already have precedent
> for "moxart" in bindings though, so changing that's likely to lead to
> more problems.

Sorry about that, I think the "moxart" contraction was suggested and
has been sticky ever since.

It's at least a little appropriate because the physical chip text
reads "MOXA ART" (photo):

https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-A-2FXDrObU8/UMcMc_K2vEI/AAAAAAAABwg/ldaLZ7ps1P4/w1331-h998-no/UC-7112-LX-picture4.jpg

Currently three drivers in linux-next use the name with accompanying
device tree bindings.
Considering the amount of patches required, can we keep the name, please?

> Sorry for yet more pendantry, but could we instead have:
>
>  - interrupts: Should contain an interrupt-specifier for the sole
>                interrupt generated by the device.

Fixed in v11.


Regards,
Jonas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/