[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131008101358.GA8852@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 12:13:58 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Alex Thorlton <athorlton@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Robin Holt <robinmholt@...il.com>,
Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 00/11] split page table lock for PMD tables
* Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > What must arch maintainers do to enable it? Have you any particular
> > > > suggestions, warnings etc to make their lives easier?
> > >
> > > The last patch is a good illustration what need to be done. It's very
> > > straight forward, I don't see any pitfalls.
> >
> > Might make sense to stick that somewhere into Documentation/mm/, to make
> > arch maintainers feel all warm and fuzzy if they look into enabling this
> > feature on their architecture.
>
> I want to rework code around page->ptl a bit more:
> - allow pgtable_page_ctor() to fail and modify callers to handle it;
> - if sizeof(spinlock_t) > sizeof(long) allocate the spinlock_t
> dynamically.
>
> It will allow to use split lock with DEBUG_SPINLOCK and DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC.
> And it will make -rt guys happier. ;)
>
> After that I'll document it. Does it work for you?
Sounds nice to me!
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists