linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the imx-mxs tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue,  8 Oct 2013 15:44:12 +0200
From:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To:	Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the imx-mxs tree

Today's linux-next merge of the imx-mxs tree got conflicts in

	arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c

caused by commits 4d9d18a (ARM: imx: remove custom .init_time hook),
e709f38 (ARM: imx6: report soc info via soc device) and 3087d32 (ARM:
imx6q: use common soc revision helpers).

I fixed it up (see below). Please verify that the resolution looks
correct.

Thanks,
Thierry
---
diff --cc arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c
index 3be0fa0,398858b..049e36e
--- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c
@@@ -190,8 -164,11 +162,14 @@@ static void __init imx6q_1588_init(void
  
  static void __init imx6q_init_machine(void)
  {
+ 	struct device *parent;
+ 
 +	imx_print_silicon_rev(cpu_is_imx6dl() ? "i.MX6DL" : "i.MX6Q",
- 			      imx6q_revision());
++			      imx_get_soc_revision());
++
+ 	parent = imx_soc_device_init();
+ 	if (parent == NULL)
+ 		pr_warn("failed to initialize soc device\n");
  
  	imx6q_enet_phy_init();
  
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/