[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131008155131.GA31975@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 11:51:31 -0400
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, fweisbec@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] x86: Allow disabling HW_BREAKPOINTS and PERF_EVENTS
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 08:59:38AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> You might want to concentrate your efforts from fighting perf
> functionality towards decreasing per tracepoint overhead instead,
> without hurting kernel functionality and maintainability.
Making it easier to disable perf entirely would be desirable for one use case.
I can't do a trinity run for more than a few hours for the last few months
without hitting perf/ftrace bugs that no-one seems to be able to get their
heads around.
It would be useful if I could in the meantime find bugs in other parts of the
kernel by disabling all the affected code.
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists