linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 28/29] tracehook_signal_handler: Remove sig, info, ka and regs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52542C0A.4010208@nod.at>
Date:	Tue, 08 Oct 2013 18:00:10 +0200
From:	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	vgupta@...opsys.com, catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com,
	hskinnemoen@...il.com, egtvedt@...fundet.no, vapier@...too.org,
	msalter@...hat.com, a-jacquiot@...com, starvik@...s.com,
	jesper.nilsson@...s.com, dhowells@...hat.com, rkuo@...eaurora.org,
	tony.luck@...el.com, fenghua.yu@...el.com, takata@...ux-m32r.org,
	geert@...ux-m68k.org, james.hogan@...tec.com, monstr@...str.eu,
	yasutake.koichi@...panasonic.com, ralf@...ux-mips.org,
	jonas@...thpole.se, jejb@...isc-linux.org, deller@....de,
	benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
	heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, liqin.linux@...il.com,
	lennox.wu@...il.com, lethal@...ux-sh.org, cmetcalf@...era.com,
	gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn, linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, oleg@...hat.com, tj@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 28/29] tracehook_signal_handler: Remove sig, info, ka
 and regs

Am 08.10.2013 17:45, schrieb Al Viro:
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 01:36:18PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> These parameters are nowhere used, so we can remove them.
> 
> I'm not sure it's a good idea...  OTOH, it probably has no business in
> tracehook.h anymore - it's only called from signal_delivered(), so if
> we decide to insert some ptrace-related work, we can bloody well do it
> there these days.  It used to be called all over the place in arch/*,
> which made a centralized definition (and getting all potentially relevant
> data to it) a lot more important.  So I'd probably suggest killing that
> function off completely - signal_delivered() acts as such centralized
> location these days.

Okay. Will kill tracehook_signal_handler() and merge it's functionality
into signal_delivered().

Thanks,
//richard

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/