linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 12/19] clk: at91: add peripheral clk macros for peripheral clk dt bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5254308F.8030607@overkiz.com>
Date:	Tue, 08 Oct 2013 18:19:27 +0200
From:	boris brezillon <b.brezillon@...rkiz.com>
To:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
	Andrew Victor <linux@...im.org.za>,
	Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>,
	Josh Wu <josh.wu@...el.com>,
	Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com>
CC:	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 12/19] clk: at91: add peripheral clk macros for peripheral
 clk dt bindings

On 08/10/2013 18:15, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> On 08/10/2013 18:01, boris brezillon :
>> On 08/10/2013 17:44, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>>> On 08/08/2013 09:10, Boris BREZILLON :
>>>> This patch adds the peripheral divisors macros (for sam9x5 compatible
>>>> IPs)
>>>> which will be used by peripheral clk dt definitions.
>>>
>>> I am in favor for these definitions. So let's keep them (with raw
>>> numbers toguether with these macros in documentation).
>>
>> I guess we should move them elsewhere if these are the only macros we 
>> keep.
>>
>> What about "include/dt-bindings/clk/at91sam9x5-periph.h" ?
>
> Well, what about a more generic clk binding file for all at91-related 
> definitions (if more come). We can still differentiate among devices 
> into the file itself...
>
> What do you think about:
> include/dt-bindings/clk/at91.h
> is it too generic?

No, this is fine.

>
> BTW, I see the clk and clock directories. What is the difference?
>

I don't know, but they both store clk (signals) specific bindings, and 
as the framework is called "clk", I choose this directory.

Could a dt maintainer (or Mike) help us choosing the appropriate directory ?

>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Boris BREZILLON <b.brezillon@...rkiz.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    .../clk/at91/at91sam9x5/clk-peripheral.h           |   15
>>>> +++++++++++++++
>>>>    1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>>>>    create mode 100644
>>>> include/dt-bindings/clk/at91/at91sam9x5/clk-peripheral.h
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clk/at91/at91sam9x5/clk-peripheral.h
>>>> b/include/dt-bindings/clk/at91/at91sam9x5/clk-peripheral.h
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 0000000..a6dd506
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clk/at91/at91sam9x5/clk-peripheral.h
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * This header provides constants for AT91 peripheral clks.
>>>> + *
>>>> + * The constants defined in this header are being used in dts.
>>>> + */
>>>> +
>>>> +#ifndef _DT_BINDINGS_CLK_AT91SAM9X5_PERIPH_H
>>>> +#define _DT_BINDINGS_CLK_AT91SAM9X5_PERIPH_H
>>>> +
>>>> +#define AT91SAM9X5_PERIPH_CLK_DIV1    0
>>>> +#define AT91SAM9X5_PERIPH_CLK_DIV2    1
>>>> +#define AT91SAM9X5_PERIPH_CLK_DIV4    2
>>>> +#define AT91SAM9X5_PERIPH_CLK_DIV8    3
>>>> +
>>>> +#endif
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/