lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <525437B5.8060907@nod.at>
Date:	Tue, 08 Oct 2013 18:49:57 +0200
From:	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To:	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, vgupta@...opsys.com,
	catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com,
	hskinnemoen@...il.com, egtvedt@...fundet.no, vapier@...too.org,
	msalter@...hat.com, a-jacquiot@...com, starvik@...s.com,
	jesper.nilsson@...s.com, dhowells@...hat.com, rkuo@...eaurora.org,
	tony.luck@...el.com, fenghua.yu@...el.com, takata@...ux-m32r.org,
	geert@...ux-m68k.org, james.hogan@...tec.com, monstr@...str.eu,
	yasutake.koichi@...panasonic.com, ralf@...ux-mips.org,
	jonas@...thpole.se, jejb@...isc-linux.org, deller@....de,
	benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
	heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, liqin.linux@...il.com,
	lennox.wu@...il.com, lethal@...ux-sh.org, cmetcalf@...era.com,
	gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn, linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, oleg@...hat.com, tj@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/29] ia64: Use get_signal() signal_setup_done()

Am 08.10.2013 13:33, schrieb Richard Weinberger:
> Use the more generic functions get_signal() signal_setup_done()
> for signal delivery.
> This inverts also the return codes of force_sigsegv_info()
> and setup_frame() to follow the kernel convention.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>

This one does not build, the patch is corrupted.
An updated version will be in v2.

Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@...el.com>

Thanks,
//richard

> ---
>  arch/ia64/kernel/signal.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/signal.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/signal.c
> index 3637e03..b995dbf 100644
> --- a/arch/ia64/kernel/signal.c
> +++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/signal.c
> @@ -309,12 +309,11 @@ force_sigsegv_info (int sig, void __user *addr)
>  	si.si_uid = from_kuid_munged(current_user_ns(), current_uid());
>  	si.si_addr = addr;
>  	force_sig_info(SIGSEGV, &si, current);
> -	return 0;
> +	return 1;
>  }
>  
>  static long
> -setup_frame (int sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, siginfo_t *info, sigset_t *set,
> -	     struct sigscratch *scr)
> +setup_frame(struct ksignal *ksig, sigset_t *set, struct sigscratch *scr)
>  {
>  	extern char __kernel_sigtramp[];
>  	unsigned long tramp_addr, new_rbs = 0, new_sp;
> @@ -323,7 +322,7 @@ setup_frame (int sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, siginfo_t *info, sigset_t *set,
>  
>  	new_sp = scr->pt.r12;
>  	tramp_addr = (unsigned long) __kernel_sigtramp;
> -	if (ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_ONSTACK) {
> +	if (ksig->ka.sa.sa_flags & SA_ONSTACK) {
>  		int onstack = sas_ss_flags(new_sp);
>  
>  		if (onstack == 0) {
> @@ -347,7 +346,7 @@ setup_frame (int sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, siginfo_t *info, sigset_t *set,
>  			 */
>  			check_sp = (new_sp - sizeof(*frame)) & -STACK_ALIGN;
>  			if (!likely(on_sig_stack(check_sp)))
> -				return force_sigsegv_info(sig, (void __user *)
> +				return force_sigsegv_info(ksig->sig, (void __user *)
>  							  check_sp);
>  		}
>  	}
> @@ -356,14 +355,14 @@ setup_frame (int sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, siginfo_t *info, sigset_t *set,
>  	if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, frame, sizeof(*frame)))
>  		return force_sigsegv_info(sig, frame);
>  
> -	err  = __put_user(sig, &frame->arg0);
> +	err  = __put_user(ksig->sig, &frame->arg0);
>  	err |= __put_user(&frame->info, &frame->arg1);
>  	err |= __put_user(&frame->sc, &frame->arg2);
>  	err |= __put_user(new_rbs, &frame->sc.sc_rbs_base);
>  	err |= __put_user(0, &frame->sc.sc_loadrs);	/* initialize to zero */
> -	err |= __put_user(ka->sa.sa_handler, &frame->handler);
> +	err |= __put_user(ksig->ka.sa.sa_handler, &frame->handler);
>  
> -	err |= copy_siginfo_to_user(&frame->info, info);
> +	err |= copy_siginfo_to_user(&frame->info, &ksig->info);
>  
>  	err |= __save_altstack(&frame->sc.sc_stack, scr->pt.r12);
>  	err |= setup_sigcontext(&frame->sc, set, scr);
> @@ -394,22 +393,20 @@ setup_frame (int sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, siginfo_t *info, sigset_t *set,
>  
>  #if DEBUG_SIG
>  	printk("SIG deliver (%s:%d): sig=%d sp=%lx ip=%lx handler=%p\n",
> -	       current->comm, current->pid, sig, scr->pt.r12, frame->sc.sc_ip, frame->handler);
> +	       current->comm, current->pid, ksig->sig, scr->pt.r12, frame->sc.sc_ip, frame->handler);
>  #endif
> -	return 1;
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static long
> -handle_signal (unsigned long sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, siginfo_t *info,
> -	       struct sigscratch *scr)
> +handle_signal (struct ksignal *ksig, struct sigscratch *scr)
>  {
> -	if (!setup_frame(sig, ka, info, sigmask_to_save(), scr))
> -		return 0;
> +	int ret = setup_frame(ksig, sigmask_to_save(), scr);
>  
> -	signal_delivered(sig, info, ka, &scr->pt,
> -				 test_thread_flag(TIF_SINGLESTEP));
> +	if (!ret)
> +		signal_setup_done(ret, ksig, test_thread_flag(TIF_SINGLESTEP));
>  
> -	return 1;
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -419,17 +416,16 @@ handle_signal (unsigned long sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, siginfo_t *info,
>  void
>  ia64_do_signal (struct sigscratch *scr, long in_syscall)
>  {
> -	struct k_sigaction ka;
> -	siginfo_t info;
>  	long restart = in_syscall;
>  	long errno = scr->pt.r8;
> +	struct ksignal ksig;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * This only loops in the rare cases of handle_signal() failing, in which case we
>  	 * need to push through a forced SIGSEGV.
>  	 */
>  	while (1) {
> -		int signr = get_signal_to_deliver(&info, &ka, &scr->pt, NULL);
> +		get_signal(&ksig);
>  
>  		/*
>  		 * get_signal_to_deliver() may have run a debugger (via notify_parent())
> @@ -446,7 +442,7 @@ ia64_do_signal (struct sigscratch *scr, long in_syscall)
>  			 */
>  			restart = 0;
>  
> -		if (signr <= 0)
> +		if (ksig.sig <= 0)
>  			break;
>  
>  		if (unlikely(restart)) {
> @@ -458,7 +454,7 @@ ia64_do_signal (struct sigscratch *scr, long in_syscall)
>  				break;
>  
>  			      case ERESTARTSYS:
> -				if ((ka.sa.sa_flags & SA_RESTART) == 0) {
> +				if ((ksig.ka.sa.sa_flags & SA_RESTART) == 0) {
>  					scr->pt.r8 = EINTR;
>  					/* note: scr->pt.r10 is already -1 */
>  					break;
> @@ -473,7 +469,7 @@ ia64_do_signal (struct sigscratch *scr, long in_syscall)
>  		 * Whee!  Actually deliver the signal.  If the delivery failed, we need to
>  		 * continue to iterate in this loop so we can deliver the SIGSEGV...
>  		 */
> -		if (handle_signal(signr, &ka, &info, scr))
> +		if (handle_signal(&ksig, scr))
>  			return;
>  	}
>  
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ