[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1381252547.12191.58.camel@edumazet-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 10:15:47 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Anatol Pomozov <anatol.pomozov@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, joe@...ches.com,
rdunlap@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] core: Catch overflows in do_div() function
On Tue, 2013-10-08 at 09:10 -0700, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
> If second parameter passed to this function was 64 then it silently
> truncates to 32 bits. Catch such situation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anatol Pomozov <anatol.pomozov@...il.com>
> ---
> include/asm-generic/div64.h | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/div64.h b/include/asm-generic/div64.h
> index 8f4e319..84339a0 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/div64.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/div64.h
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> * beware of side effects!
> */
>
> +#include <linux/bug.h>
> #include <linux/types.h>
> #include <linux/compiler.h>
>
> @@ -25,6 +26,7 @@
> # define do_div(n,base) ({ \
> uint32_t __base = (base); \
> uint32_t __rem; \
> + BUG_ON(sizeof(base) > 4 && base >= (1UL<<32)); \
Problem is about
uint32_t __base = (base);
This was designed to avoid "base" being evaluated twice, as in
do_div(X, ++Y);
So I guess you need something to keep this in place.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists