linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] vmsplice: Add limited zero copy to vmsplice

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131008173521.GA6129@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Tue, 8 Oct 2013 12:35:21 -0500
From:	Robert Jennings <rcj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Matt Helsley <matt.helsley@...il.com>,
	Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>,
	Michael Roth <mdroth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Lei Li <lilei@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Leonardo Garcia <lagarcia@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] vmsplice: Add limited zero copy to vmsplice

* Dave Hansen (dave@...1.net) wrote:
> On 10/07/2013 01:21 PM, Robert C Jennings wrote:
> > +	if (!buf->offset && (buf->len == PAGE_SIZE) &&
> > +	    (buf->flags & PIPE_BUF_FLAG_GIFT) && (sd->flags & SPLICE_F_MOVE)) {
> > +		struct page *page = buf->page;
> > +		struct mm_struct *mm;
> > +		struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> > +		spinlock_t *ptl;
> > +		pte_t *ptep, pte;
> > +		unsigned long useraddr;
> > +
> > +		if (!PageAnon(page))
> > +			goto copy;
> > +		if (PageCompound(page))
> > +			goto copy;
> > +		if (PageHuge(page) || PageTransHuge(page))
> > +			goto copy;
> > +		if (page_mapped(page))
> > +			goto copy;
> 
> I'd really like to see some comments about those cases.  You touched on
> page_mapped() above, but could you replicate some of that in a comment?

Yes, I'll add comments in the code for these cases.

> Also, considering that this is being targeted at QEMU VMs, I would
> imagine that you're going to want to support PageTransHuge() in here
> pretty fast.  Do you anticipate that being very much trouble?  Have you
> planned for it in here?

My focus with this patch set was to get agreement on the change in the
first patch of the vmsplice syscall flags to perform page flipping rather
than copying.

I am working on support of PageTransHuge() but it is not complete.
It reworks this function to coalesce PAGE_SIZE pipe buffers into THP-sized
units and operate on those.

> > +		useraddr = (unsigned long)sd->u.userptr;
> > +		mm = current->mm;
> > +
> > +		ret = -EAGAIN;
> > +		down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> > +		vma = find_vma_intersection(mm, useraddr, useraddr + PAGE_SIZE);
> 
> If oyu are only doing these a page at a time, why bother with
> find_vma_intersection()?  Why not a plain find_vma()?

You're correct, I can change this to use find_vma().

> Also, if we fail to find a VMA, won't this return -EAGAIN?  That seems
> like a rather uninformative error code to get returned back out to
> userspace, especially since retrying won't help.

Yes, -EAGAIN is not good for this case, I will use -EFAULT.

> > +		if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(vma))
> > +			goto up_copy;
> > +		if (!vma->anon_vma) {
> > +			ret = anon_vma_prepare(vma);
> > +			if (ret)
> > +				goto up_copy;
> > +		}
> 
> The first thing anon_vma_prepare() does is check vma->anon_vma.  This
> extra check seems unnecessary.

I'll fix this, thanks.

> > +		zap_page_range(vma, useraddr, PAGE_SIZE, NULL);
> > +		ret = lock_page_killable(page);
> > +		if (ret)
> > +			goto up_copy;
> > +		ptep = get_locked_pte(mm, useraddr, &ptl);
> > +		if (!ptep)
> > +			goto unlock_up_copy;
> > +		pte = *ptep;
> > +		if (pte_present(pte))
> > +			goto unlock_up_copy;
> > +		get_page(page);
> > +		page_add_anon_rmap(page, vma, useraddr);
> > +		pte = mk_pte(page, vma->vm_page_prot);
> 
> 'pte' is getting used for two different things here, which makes it a
> bit confusing.  I'd probably just skip this first assignment and
> directly do:
> 
> 		if (pte_present(*ptep))
> 			goto unlock_up_copy;

I'll fix this, thanks.

> > +		set_pte_at(mm, useraddr, ptep, pte);
> > +		update_mmu_cache(vma, useraddr, ptep);
> > +		pte_unmap_unlock(ptep, ptl);
> > +		ret = 0;
> > +unlock_up_copy:
> > +		unlock_page(page);
> > +up_copy:
> > +		up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> > +		if (!ret) {
> > +			ret = sd->len;
> > +			goto out;
> > +		}
> > +		/* else ret < 0 and we should fallback to copying */
> > +		VM_BUG_ON(ret > 0);
> > +	}
> 
> This also screams to be broken out in to a helper function instead of
> just being thrown in with the existing code.

You're right, it's very self-contained already.  I'll pull it out. 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/