[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <4296924.z1ntgL0xa6@amdc1032>
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 19:40:48 +0200
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
To: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@...com>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal: offer TI thermal support only when ARCH_OMAP2PLUS
is defined
On Tuesday, October 08, 2013 06:59:19 PM Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
[...]
> > Restricting drivers to be compiled to specific architecture is a poor
> > design strategy. Specifically, on the TI Bandgap device driver, as I
> > already mentioned to you, this is again clear, as it is currently used
> > on different archs, and the code can be easily reused when other archs,
> > different than DRA and OMAP, need it.
>
> It is the correct strategy to restrict hardware specific device drivers
> (i.e. ARM Exynos thermal driver) to be compiled only for hardware that
> it is available on (i.e. ARM Exynos SoCs). If TI bandgap driver is not
> hardware specific and can be used on non TI hardware than you're of
> course right.
Just small addition. We are not using TI bandgap IP in any current ARM
Samsung SoCs so TI bandgap IP support should not be available on them
(=> we should not use ARCH_HAS_BANDGAP at all, usage for EXYNOS_THERMAL
is incorrect as I already explained in previous mail).
OTOH archs/SoCs that are using such IP can select ARCH_HAS_BANDGAP freely.
Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists