[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFx5i=vPeqx9S2WMZdqVC+g-MTczQxPa0mi84Vbs6_YF0g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 12:20:26 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@...hat.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [x86] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00740060
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> If you suspect a compiler bug, can somebody please narrow it down to
> a single object file (if I've skimmed the patch right, it is just an
> optimization, where object files compiled without and with the patch
> should actually coexist fine in the same kernel), ideally to a single
> routine if possible and post a preprocessed source + gcc command line
> + version of gcc?
It is indeed just an optimization, and we could in theory switch
between the two versions on a case-by-case basis, but we don't have
any sane way to really do that.
I'll try to see if I can reproduce this on my hardware (just applying
that patch on top of my own tip) and see if I can try to narrow things
down. But I looked at the assembly for a couple of files, and it all
looked good, and I know this patch works fine for others (ie all the
normal -tip testing), so I suspect it's something specific to what
Fengguang does.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists