linux-kernel - Re: [patch 0/3] Soft dirty tracking fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 8 Oct 2013 13:06:24 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 0/3] Soft dirty tracking fixes

On Wed, 9 Oct 2013 00:02:24 +0400 Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 12:50:13PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > 
> > Do you consider the problems which patches 1 and 2 address to be
> > sufficiently serious to justify backporting into -stable?
> 
> Good question! Yeah, since dirty bit traking is in 3.11 already,
> it would be great to merge these two patches into -stable.

OK.

> Should I resend them with stable team CC'ed?

Nope, I added cc:stable to the changelogs so they should receive
consideration by Greg automatically.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/