[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131008035623.GA31666@concordia>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 14:56:23 +1100
From: Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/legacy_serial: fix incorrect placement of
__initdata tag
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 01:51:27PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 01, 2013 04:13:25 PM Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 03:11:42PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > __initdata tag should be placed between the variable name and equal
> > > sign for the variable to be placed in the intended .init.data section.
> >
> > I see lots of other occurences of that in arch/powerpc. Why not send a
> > single patch to update them all?
>
> The other occurences while not following the preferred kernel coding style
> are (probably) working OK with gcc. This particular occurence just doesn't
> work as it should.
Why would the other occurrences work but not this one?
Regardless, why don't we just do a single patch to clean them all up to
match coding style and (probably) do what they're intended.
cheers
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists