[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <5254FA36.2040803@samsung.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 15:39:50 +0900
From: "sangjung.woo" <sangjung.woo@...sung.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Guan Xuetao <gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sangjung.woo@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: rtc-puv3: use dev_dbg() instead of pr_debug()
On 10/09/2013 03:20 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-10-09 at 14:49 +0900, Sangjung Woo wrote:
>> Because dev_*() are used along with pr_debug() function in this code,
>> the debug message is not tidy. This patch converts from pr_debug() to
>> dev_dbg() since dev_*() are encouraged to use in device driver code.
> []
>> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-puv3.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-puv3.c
> []
>> @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ static void puv3_rtc_setaie(int to)
>> {
>> unsigned int tmp;
>>
>> - pr_debug("%s: aie=%d\n", __func__, to);
>> + dev_dbg(dev, "%s: aie=%d\n", __func__, to);
> Does this compile?
>
>
Oops! I did not add my local modification into the patch.
The function parameters should be modified as below.
-static void puv3_rtc_setaie(int to)
+static void puv3_rtc_setaie(struct device *dev, int to)
I will send the new one.
Thank you for your good review.
Cheers, Sangjung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists