[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131009154424.GA8564@roeck-us.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 08:44:24 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 9
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 08:29:06AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 04:14:22PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've uploaded today's linux-next tree to the master branch of the
> > repository below:
> >
> > git://gitorious.org/thierryreding/linux-next.git
> >
> > A next-20131009 tag is also provided for convenience.
> >
> > Gained a few conflicts, but nothing too exciting. x86, ARM, PowerPC and
> > MIPS default configurations build fine. There were some build failures
> > unrelated to the merge, most of which I fixed and added as patches on
> > top of the final merge.
> >
> Build results:
> total: 110 pass: 93 skipped: 4 fail: 13
> [3.12-rc4: total: 110 pass: 105 skipped: 3 fail: 2]
>
> Failed builds:
> alpha:allmodconfig
> arm:allmodconfig
> blackfin:defconfig
> i386:allyesconfig
> i386:allmodconfig
> m68k:allmodconfig
> mips:allmodconfig
> mips:nlm_xlp_defconfig
> powerpc:allmodconfig
> sparc64:allmodconfig
> x86_64:allmodconfig
> x86_64:allyesconfig
> xtensa:allmodconfig
>
> Many of the failures are due to ceph:
>
> fs/ceph/file.c: In function 'ceph_sync_read':
> fs/ceph/file.c:437:25: error: 'struct iov_iter' has no member named 'iov'
> ...
>
Sorry, that was the result for yesterday's tree. I should have results for the
October 9 tree in a couple of hours.
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists