[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFyFJMUAADPmGHUVX9OWOt_jN=WhfQ0EBMCY5+LOKxMXqA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 18:33:45 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
Jakub Jelinek <jakub@...hat.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [x86] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null)
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com> wrote:
> [ 27.189229] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000108
> [ 27.190165] IP: [<c1109200>] rw_verify_area+0xa0/0x1b0
This looks like file->f_inode is NULL, and it's trying to access inode->i_flock.
There's a number of other ones too (that last delayed __fput one, for
example) that might be due to a NULL inode.
And a lot of thre rest are file-handling too, with the BUG_ON() in
__put_cred() when there's something wrong with file->f_cred.
.. but I have no clue how that could happen and why the asm goto
should matter for this.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists