[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-9e645ab6d089f5822479a833c6977c785bcfffe3@git.kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 10:26:12 -0700
From: tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...nel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, hannes@...xchg.org, riel@...hat.com,
srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, aarcange@...hat.com, mgorman@...e.de,
tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: [tip:sched/core] sched/numa:
Continue PTE scanning even if migrate rate limited
Commit-ID: 9e645ab6d089f5822479a833c6977c785bcfffe3
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/9e645ab6d089f5822479a833c6977c785bcfffe3
Author: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
AuthorDate: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 11:28:52 +0100
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 12:40:09 +0200
sched/numa: Continue PTE scanning even if migrate rate limited
Avoiding marking PTEs pte_numa because a particular NUMA node is migrate rate
limited sees like a bad idea. Even if this node can't migrate anymore other
nodes might and we want up-to-date information to do balance decisions.
We already rate limit the actual migrations, this should leave enough
bandwidth to allow the non-migrating scanning. I think its important we
keep up-to-date information if we're going to do placement based on it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1381141781-10992-15-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 8 --------
1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 573d815e..464207f 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -951,14 +951,6 @@ void task_numa_work(struct callback_head *work)
*/
p->node_stamp += 2 * TICK_NSEC;
- /*
- * Do not set pte_numa if the current running node is rate-limited.
- * This loses statistics on the fault but if we are unwilling to
- * migrate to this node, it is less likely we can do useful work
- */
- if (migrate_ratelimited(numa_node_id()))
- return;
-
start = mm->numa_scan_offset;
pages = sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_size;
pages <<= 20 - PAGE_SHIFT; /* MB in pages */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists