| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 10:32:42 -0700
From: tip-bot for Rik van Riel <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...nel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, hannes@...xchg.org, riel@...hat.com,
aarcange@...hat.com, srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, mgorman@...e.de,
tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: [tip:sched/core] sched/numa:
Decide whether to favour task or group weights based on swap candidate relationships
Commit-ID: 887c290e82e8950d854730c084904c115fc367ac
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/887c290e82e8950d854730c084904c115fc367ac
Author: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
AuthorDate: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 11:29:31 +0100
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 14:48:06 +0200
sched/numa: Decide whether to favour task or group weights based on swap candidate relationships
This patch separately considers task and group affinities when searching
for swap candidates during task NUMA placement. If tasks are not part of
a group or the same group then the task weights are considered.
Otherwise the group weights are compared.
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1381141781-10992-54-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 2876a37..6f45461 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -1039,13 +1039,15 @@ static void task_numa_assign(struct task_numa_env *env,
* into account that it might be best if task running on the dst_cpu should
* be exchanged with the source task
*/
-static void task_numa_compare(struct task_numa_env *env, long imp)
+static void task_numa_compare(struct task_numa_env *env,
+ long taskimp, long groupimp)
{
struct rq *src_rq = cpu_rq(env->src_cpu);
struct rq *dst_rq = cpu_rq(env->dst_cpu);
struct task_struct *cur;
long dst_load, src_load;
long load;
+ long imp = (groupimp > 0) ? groupimp : taskimp;
rcu_read_lock();
cur = ACCESS_ONCE(dst_rq->curr);
@@ -1064,10 +1066,19 @@ static void task_numa_compare(struct task_numa_env *env, long imp)
if (!cpumask_test_cpu(env->src_cpu, tsk_cpus_allowed(cur)))
goto unlock;
- imp += task_weight(cur, env->src_nid) +
- group_weight(cur, env->src_nid) -
- task_weight(cur, env->dst_nid) -
- group_weight(cur, env->dst_nid);
+ /*
+ * If dst and source tasks are in the same NUMA group, or not
+ * in any group then look only at task weights otherwise give
+ * priority to the group weights.
+ */
+ if (!cur->numa_group || !env->p->numa_group ||
+ cur->numa_group == env->p->numa_group) {
+ imp = taskimp + task_weight(cur, env->src_nid) -
+ task_weight(cur, env->dst_nid);
+ } else {
+ imp = groupimp + group_weight(cur, env->src_nid) -
+ group_weight(cur, env->dst_nid);
+ }
}
if (imp < env->best_imp)
@@ -1117,7 +1128,8 @@ unlock:
rcu_read_unlock();
}
-static void task_numa_find_cpu(struct task_numa_env *env, long imp)
+static void task_numa_find_cpu(struct task_numa_env *env,
+ long taskimp, long groupimp)
{
int cpu;
@@ -1127,7 +1139,7 @@ static void task_numa_find_cpu(struct task_numa_env *env, long imp)
continue;
env->dst_cpu = cpu;
- task_numa_compare(env, imp);
+ task_numa_compare(env, taskimp, groupimp);
}
}
@@ -1146,9 +1158,9 @@ static int task_numa_migrate(struct task_struct *p)
.best_cpu = -1
};
struct sched_domain *sd;
- unsigned long weight;
+ unsigned long taskweight, groupweight;
int nid, ret;
- long imp;
+ long taskimp, groupimp;
/*
* Pick the lowest SD_NUMA domain, as that would have the smallest
@@ -1163,15 +1175,17 @@ static int task_numa_migrate(struct task_struct *p)
env.imbalance_pct = 100 + (sd->imbalance_pct - 100) / 2;
rcu_read_unlock();
- weight = task_weight(p, env.src_nid) + group_weight(p, env.src_nid);
+ taskweight = task_weight(p, env.src_nid);
+ groupweight = group_weight(p, env.src_nid);
update_numa_stats(&env.src_stats, env.src_nid);
env.dst_nid = p->numa_preferred_nid;
- imp = task_weight(p, env.dst_nid) + group_weight(p, env.dst_nid) - weight;
+ taskimp = task_weight(p, env.dst_nid) - taskweight;
+ groupimp = group_weight(p, env.dst_nid) - groupweight;
update_numa_stats(&env.dst_stats, env.dst_nid);
/* If the preferred nid has capacity, try to use it. */
if (env.dst_stats.has_capacity)
- task_numa_find_cpu(&env, imp);
+ task_numa_find_cpu(&env, taskimp, groupimp);
/* No space available on the preferred nid. Look elsewhere. */
if (env.best_cpu == -1) {
@@ -1180,13 +1194,14 @@ static int task_numa_migrate(struct task_struct *p)
continue;
/* Only consider nodes where both task and groups benefit */
- imp = task_weight(p, nid) + group_weight(p, nid) - weight;
- if (imp < 0)
+ taskimp = task_weight(p, nid) - taskweight;
+ groupimp = group_weight(p, nid) - groupweight;
+ if (taskimp < 0 && groupimp < 0)
continue;
env.dst_nid = nid;
update_numa_stats(&env.dst_stats, env.dst_nid);
- task_numa_find_cpu(&env, imp);
+ task_numa_find_cpu(&env, taskimp, groupimp);
}
}
@@ -4679,10 +4694,9 @@ static bool migrate_improves_locality(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env)
if (dst_nid == p->numa_preferred_nid)
return true;
- /* After the task has settled, check if the new node is better. */
- if (p->numa_migrate_seq >= sysctl_numa_balancing_settle_count &&
- task_weight(p, dst_nid) + group_weight(p, dst_nid) >
- task_weight(p, src_nid) + group_weight(p, src_nid))
+ /* If both task and group weight improve, this move is a winner. */
+ if (task_weight(p, dst_nid) > task_weight(p, src_nid) &&
+ group_weight(p, dst_nid) > group_weight(p, src_nid))
return true;
return false;
@@ -4709,10 +4723,9 @@ static bool migrate_degrades_locality(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env)
if (src_nid == p->numa_preferred_nid)
return true;
- /* After the task has settled, check if the new node is worse. */
- if (p->numa_migrate_seq >= sysctl_numa_balancing_settle_count &&
- task_weight(p, dst_nid) + group_weight(p, dst_nid) <
- task_weight(p, src_nid) + group_weight(p, src_nid))
+ /* If either task or group weight get worse, don't do it. */
+ if (task_weight(p, dst_nid) < task_weight(p, src_nid) ||
+ group_weight(p, dst_nid) < group_weight(p, src_nid))
return true;
return false;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists