lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 21:46:58 +0200 From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...hat.com> To: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org> Cc: linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, target-devel <target-devel@...r.kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> Subject: Re: scsi-mq updated to latest linux-block/new-queue On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 12:12:51PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > Just a heads up that the scsi-mq alpha branch has been updated to Jen's > latest linux-block/new-queue containing hch's recent blk-mq > improvements, along with Alexander's patch for the is_flush_fua + > queue_depth=1 bug. Oh, I have not expected it could be picked up. In fact I agree it needs to be updated with what you spotted: "Also, these extra increments should probably happen only when the passed queue_depth == 1 && reserved_tags == 0." What is the criteria for patches to include in your tree? I would suggest to consider this one https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/9/90 if it fits. -- Regards, Alexander Gordeev agordeev@...hat.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists