linux-kernel - Re: scsi-mq updated to latest linux-block/new-queue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131009194658.GA3066@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 9 Oct 2013 21:46:58 +0200
From:	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...hat.com>
To:	"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
Cc:	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	target-devel <target-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: scsi-mq updated to latest linux-block/new-queue

On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 12:12:51PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> Just a heads up that the scsi-mq alpha branch has been updated to Jen's
> latest linux-block/new-queue containing hch's recent blk-mq
> improvements, along with Alexander's patch for the is_flush_fua +
> queue_depth=1 bug.


Oh, I have not expected it could be picked up. In fact I agree it needs
to be updated with what you spotted:

"Also, these extra increments should probably happen only when the passed
queue_depth == 1 && reserved_tags == 0."

What is the criteria for patches to include in your tree? I would suggest
to consider this one https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/9/90 if it fits.

-- 
Regards,
Alexander Gordeev
agordeev@...hat.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/