[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131009195250.GL13848@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 21:52:50 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] rcu: Create rcu_sync infrastructure
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 02:40:45PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> OK, so this is a real nit, but...in the changelog:
>
> > static inline void rcu_sync_enter(struct rcu_sync_struct *xxx)
> > {
> > atomic_inc(&xxx->counter);
> > synchronize_sched();
> > }
> >
> > static inline void rcu_sync_enter(struct rcu_sync_struct *xxx)
> > {
> > synchronize_sched();
> > atomic_dec(&xxx->counter);
> > }
>
> That second rcu_sync_enter should really be rcu_sync_exit.
>
> Is the "xxx" there to test spamassassin configurations? :)
Uhh, no, its a search-n-replace fail, Oleg's original email on the
subject called the entire primitive xxx. I replaced (some) of them with
rcu_sync.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists