[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1381354186-16285-5-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 14:29:38 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, darren@...art.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
sbw@....edu, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>, Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
linux-decnet-user@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 05/13] decnet: Apply rcu_access_pointer() to avoid sparse false positive
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
The sparse checking for rcu_assign_pointer() was recently upgraded
to reject non-__kernel address spaces. This also rejects __rcu,
which is almost always the right thing to do. However, the use in
dn_insert_route() is legitimate: It is assigning a pointer to an element
from an RCU-protected list, and all elements of this list are already
visible to caller.
This commit therefore silences this false positive by laundering the
pointer using rcu_access_pointer() as suggested by Josh Triplett.
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
Cc: Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Cc: linux-decnet-user@...ts.sourceforge.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
---
net/decnet/dn_route.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/decnet/dn_route.c b/net/decnet/dn_route.c
index fe32388ea24f..3b1357bcfc92 100644
--- a/net/decnet/dn_route.c
+++ b/net/decnet/dn_route.c
@@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ static int dn_insert_route(struct dn_route *rt, unsigned int hash, struct dn_rou
/* Put it first */
*rthp = rth->dst.dn_next;
rcu_assign_pointer(rth->dst.dn_next,
- dn_rt_hash_table[hash].chain);
+ rcu_access_pointer(dn_rt_hash_table[hash].chain));
rcu_assign_pointer(dn_rt_hash_table[hash].chain, rth);
dst_use(&rth->dst, now);
@@ -358,7 +358,8 @@ static int dn_insert_route(struct dn_route *rt, unsigned int hash, struct dn_rou
rthp = &rth->dst.dn_next;
}
- rcu_assign_pointer(rt->dst.dn_next, dn_rt_hash_table[hash].chain);
+ rcu_assign_pointer(rt->dst.dn_next,
+ rcu_access_pointer(dn_rt_hash_table[hash].chain));
rcu_assign_pointer(dn_rt_hash_table[hash].chain, rt);
dst_use(&rt->dst, now);
--
1.8.1.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists