linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 07/13] ipv6/ip6_tunnel: Apply rcu_access

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131009223652.GC5790@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Wed, 9 Oct 2013 15:36:52 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
	laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
	josh@...htriplett.org, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
	edumazet@...gle.com, darren@...art.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
	sbw@....edu, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
	Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 07/13] ipv6/ip6_tunnel: Apply
 rcu_access_pointer() to avoid sparse false positive

On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 03:10:24PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-10-09 at 14:57 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> 
> > Hmmm...  I could use RCU_INIT_POINTER().  Something like the following?
> > 
> > 	RCU_INIT_POINTER(ACCESS_ONCE(*tp), t->next);
> > 
> > The ACCESS_ONCE() to prevent the compiler from doing anything stupid.
> > Presumably the value of t->next cannot change, so a normal load suffices.
> > 
> > Or did you have something else in mind?
> 
> Well, *tp and t->next are both of the same type, with __rcu attribute.
> 
> struct ip6_tnl __rcu **tp;
> 
> So I meant :
> 
> ACCESS_ONCE(*tp) = t->next;
> 
> If really we can have a really stupid compiler.

That would work, though it would probably give sparse complaints.

Of course, it is not the stupid compilers that worry me, but rather the
smart ones...

							Thanx, Paul

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/