linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] clocksource: fix misleading comment for __clocksource_updatefreq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5255E847.9030502@linaro.org>
Date:	Wed, 09 Oct 2013 16:35:35 -0700
From:	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To:	Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@...wei.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] clocksource: fix misleading comment for __clocksource_updatefreq_scale()

On 09/17/2013 07:57 PM, Xie XiuQi wrote:
> Functions clocksource_updatefreq_hz() and clocksource_updatefreq_khz()
> mentioned in the comment of __clocksource_updatefreq_scale() do not exist.
>
> As Thomas Gleixner's suggestion, I renamed the functions and the few call
> sites because the underscores are completely meaningless.

First of all, sorry for taking so long to reply here.

So I think the __ tries to imply that those are semi-internal functions
that aren't to be causally used w/o understanding the internal details.

> Signed-off-by: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@...wei.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> ---
>  drivers/clocksource/cadence_ttc_timer.c | 2 +-
>  drivers/clocksource/em_sti.c            | 2 +-
>  drivers/clocksource/sh_cmt.c            | 2 +-
>  drivers/clocksource/sh_tmu.c            | 2 +-
>  include/linux/clocksource.h             | 4 ++--
>  5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/cadence_ttc_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/cadence_ttc_timer.c
> index 4cbe28c..05f00e7 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/cadence_ttc_timer.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/cadence_ttc_timer.c
> @@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ static int ttc_rate_change_clocksource_cb(struct notifier_block *nb,
>  		 * Do whatever is necessary to maintain a proper time base
>  		 *
>  		 * I cannot find a way to adjust the currently used clocksource
> -		 * to the new frequency. __clocksource_updatefreq_hz() sounds
> +		 * to the new frequency. clocksource_updatefreq_hz() sounds
>  		 * good, but does not work. Not sure what's that missing.
>  		 *

So I know you didn't write the comment, but my issue with this comment
is that there isn't a way to adjust the currently used clocksource
frequency, because that is totally unsupported. The
__clocksource_updatefreq_hz() method is really only there for
clocksources that are currently not in-use and are disabled.
Specifically for clocksources that may come out of resume at a different
frequency, like the sh_ ones. Hacks like what the cadence_ttc driver is
trying to do result in very poor timekeeping.

So I'm sort of on the fence about this patch.

Thomas: Any other thoughts?

thanks
-john
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/